HWe posed this question to eleven leading scholars of foreign policy and national security. The responses, contained in the working papers on this page, were presented at a meeting of our National Security Working Group on June 24, 2006 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Together, the scholars advocate a broad strategy that combats terrorism on all fronts—not only on the battlefield—and that directs our resources toward the unique threats of the post-9/11 era. Such a strategy would, at a minimum, accomplish five key objectives:

  • Prevent terrorists from acquiring nuclear weapons
  • Arrive at an endgame in Iraq
  • Spread democracy and win the war of ideas
  • Fight terrorism with a broader seat of tools
  • Manage the rise of great powers

Although the eleven scholars do not agree on every issue, they do agree that the nation’s current national security strategy is deeply flawed and that a new approach is urgently needed. Their papers contain the seeds of this new approach, which the scholars are committed to developing and refining.

The working papers on this page were written by members of the Tobin Project's National Security Working Group.

All papers represent the authors' own views.

Hard copies can be obtained by contacting the Tobin Project at:

One Mifflin Place - Suite 240
Cambridge, MA 02138
(617) 547-2600






Document links require Adobe Reader.
Get Adobe Reader

Archived Discussion Papers

Introduction and compiled papers

Prevent terrorists from acquiring nuclear weapons

Arrive at an endgame in Iraq

  • Iraq Disengagement
    Barry Posen, Ford International Professor of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Spread democracy and win the war of ideas

Finance and fight a broader War on Terror

Manage the rise of great powers

* This paper appears on the web site of the MIT Center for International Studies.